Opinion

Bizzell v. State

  • 72 Tex. Crim. 442
  • 162 S.W. 861
  • 1913 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 659
Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Filed
Dec 10, 1913
Status
Published
On the bench
Davidson, Harper, Prendergast
Cited by
11 cases
Authority
More cited than 2.1%

The opinion

I do not care to dissent further than to say I am inclined to believe that this case is distinguishable from Miller's case, 47 Tex. Crim. 329 , by reason of the change in the law by Act of 1907, wherein it is required that all parties claiming exemption from jury service must file their affidavits with the clerk before convening of court, otherwise the court can not excuse them. *Page 449

ON REHEARING. January 14, 1914.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.