Opinion

Bizzell v. State

  • 72 Tex. Crim. 442
  • 162 S.W. 861
  • 1913 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 659
Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Filed
Dec 10, 1913
Status
Published
On the bench
Davidson, Harper, Prendergast
Cited by
11 cases

The opinion

Inasmuch as the record discloses that when the names of each of the absent jurors was called, and defendant demanded they be brought in, the State's counsel stated he would peremptorily challenge the juror, and such challenge was charged to the State, I agree to the judgment of affirmance.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.