Opinion

Etheridge v. State

  • 76 Tex. Crim. 198
  • 173 S.W. 1031
  • 1915 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 333
Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Filed
Feb 10, 1915
Status
Published
On the bench
Davidson, Harper, Prendergast
Cited by
4 cases

The opinion

This opinion it in direct conflict with the cases of Etheridge v. State, Nos. 3364 and 3365, recently decided, in which Judge Harper concurred and Presiding Judge Prendergast dissented. Concurring in that case Judge Harper cites cases showing want of jurisdiction in County Court where no information had been filed. That the County Court was without jurisdiction is not debatable under the Constitution, statutes and decisions. I may write later and collate *Page 209

authorities, but it would be of no value if what has been written is to be ignored. We can not now tell what a day may bring forth.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.