Opinion

Laird v. State

  • 79 Tex. Crim. 129
  • 184 S.W. 810
  • 3 A.L.R. 522
  • 1916 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 83
Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Filed
Jan 26, 1916
Status
Published
On the bench
Davidson, Harper, Prendergast
Cited by
9 cases

divorce decree not subject to attack on jurisdictional grounds by spouse who obtained it where, in criminal action, former wife’s competency as witness is in issue

How later courts described this case

  • divorce decree not subject to attack on jurisdictional grounds by spouse who obtained it where, in criminal action, former wife’s competency as witness is in issue

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

The opinion dismissing this cause was correct, and was agreed to expressly by both my associates before it was handed down, though Judge Davidson was absent the day it was handed down. But as it is merely a matter of practice for the first time established, though wrong, I will not further discuss it.

In my opinion the petition in the divorce case was admissible in this, as an admission or statement by appellant, just as any other admission or statement by him would have been, and the court did not err in not limiting as it is claimed by appellant it should have been.

Judge Harper's opinion otherwise is correct, and unquestionably the law of and applicable to this case.

The authorities and principles cited by Judge Davidson in his *Page 144

dissenting opinion, are wholly inapplicable to this case, and the questions decided therein.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.