Opinion

Laird v. State

  • 79 Tex. Crim. 129
  • 184 S.W. 810
  • 3 A.L.R. 522
  • 1916 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 83
Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Filed
Jan 26, 1916
Status
Published
On the bench
Davidson, Harper, Prendergast
Cited by
9 cases

divorce decree not subject to attack on jurisdictional grounds by spouse who obtained it where, in criminal action, former wife’s competency as witness is in issue

How later courts described this case

  • divorce decree not subject to attack on jurisdictional grounds by spouse who obtained it where, in criminal action, former wife’s competency as witness is in issue

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

I agree to the reinstatement of the appeal, but do not agree to the affirmance. The judgment ought to be reversed. I may write later.

PRENDERGAST, PRESIDING JUDGE, dissents from the reinstatement, but concurs in the affirmance.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.