Opinion
The opinion
I dissent, believing the evidence was sufficient to sustain, not only the $500 recovery for lost profits in the operation of the gin, but also the $1,500 of damage to the plant, without taking into consideration the articles or appliances which were shown not to have been damaged.
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.
A word about cookies
We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.