Opinion

Schintz v. Morris

  • 13 Tex. Civ. App. 580
  • 35 S.W. 516
Court
Court of Appeals of Texas
Filed
May 6, 1896
Status
Published
On the bench
Collard, Fisher, Key
Cited by
24 cases

noting that a trial court’s decision to grant a motion for new trial, thereby setting aside the only judgment that was rendered on the verdict, had “the effect of destroying the life of the verdict for all purposes.”

How later courts described this case

  • noting that a trial court’s decision to grant a motion for new trial, thereby setting aside the only judgment that was rendered on the verdict, had “the effect of destroying the life of the verdict for all purposes.”
  • noting that a decision to grant a motion for new trial, thereby setting aside the only judgment that was rendered on the verdict, had "the effect of destroying the life of the verdict for all purposes."

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

I do not concur in all that is said in the above opinion, nor do I agree to the disposition made of the case; and at a future day will file the reasons for my dissent.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.