Opinion

Snodgrass v. State

  • 67 Tex. Crim. 615
  • 150 S.W. 197
  • 1912 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 516
Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Filed
Feb 14, 1912
Status
Published
On the bench
Davidson, Harper, Prendergast
Cited by
42 cases

"[The] sentence is distinct from, and independent of, the judgment, and is, in fact, the final judgment in the cause."

How later courts described this case

  • "[The] sentence is distinct from, and independent of, the judgment, and is, in fact, the final judgment in the cause."

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

When the original opinion herein, and in the companion case were delivered, declaring the Act quoted in the original opinion unconstitutional, I had so much doubt, and expressed it, I was then unwilling to concur in those opinions on that question. Since then upon a more thorough investigation and consideration of the question, I am convinced that said Act is unconstitutional, and I therefore concur in the opinions on that question.

The object and purpose of the Act is so commendable I regret exceedingly the Constitution, as it now is, prevents its being enforced. Perhaps in the wisdom of the Legislature some constitutional way will be devised to accomplish the desired purpose. If not, then the people if they desire, can so amend our Constitution as to clearly authorize it.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.