Opinion

Snodgrass v. State

  • 67 Tex. Crim. 615
  • 150 S.W. 197
  • 1912 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 516
Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Filed
Feb 14, 1912
Status
Published
On the bench
Davidson, Harper, Prendergast
Cited by
42 cases

"[The] sentence is distinct from, and independent of, the judgment, and is, in fact, the final judgment in the cause."

How later courts described this case

  • "[The] sentence is distinct from, and independent of, the judgment, and is, in fact, the final judgment in the cause."

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

I am inclined to believe the Act of the Thirty-Second Legislature quoted in the opinion is constitutional. At least, I have such doubt that I am unwilling to agree to the opinion declaring it unconstitutional.

ON REHEARING. October 16, 1912.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.