Opinion

Scott v. State

  • 95 Tex. Crim. 82
  • 252 S.W. 766
  • 1923 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 517
Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Filed
Feb 14, 1923
Status
Published
Author
Lattimore
On the bench
Hawkins, Lattimore, Morrow
Cited by
3 cases

The opinion

ON REHEARING.

LATTIMORE, Judge.

— Upon practically an identical record in a companion case of Fields v. State, No. 6551, the majority of the court have concluded that no error was committed in the admission of evi

*88

dence of what is claimed to be other offenses, nor in the charge of the learned trial court in reference thereto. For our views in greater detail upon these questions, an expression of which here would be but a reiteration, see the opinion of the majority upon the original consideration and upon motion for rehearing in the case of Fields v. State, No. 6551, opinion this day handed down.

The motion for rehearing will be overruled.

Overruled.

ON REHEARING.

June 27, 1923.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.