Opinion

Ward's Appeal

  • 289 Pa. 458
  • 137 A. 630
  • 1927 Pa. LEXIS 586
Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Mar 17, 1927
Status
Published
Author
Sohaffeb
On the bench
Sohaffeb, Moschzisker, Frazer, Walling, Kephart, Sadler, Schaefer
Cited by
55 cases

holding board of zoning appeals nonviolative of article III, sec. 20

How later courts described this case

  • holding board of zoning appeals nonviolative of article III, sec. 20

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Dissenting Opinion by

Mr. Justice Sohaffeb:

I am not willing to assent to the view that a city zoning board may deny to a landowner the right to devote his property to business uses where it has been so used prior to the passage of the zoning ordinance. It may be that zoning ordinances which prohibit the right to erect business structures in purely residential neighborhoods should be upheld, but where a neighborhood already has a business building located therein, I think no board should have the power to compel the discontinuance of such use for reasons aesthetic or otherwise. To me this seems an unreasonable exercise of the police power.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.