Opinion

Fredericks v. Atlantic Refining Co.

  • 282 Pa. 8
  • 127 A. 615
  • 38 A.L.R. 666
  • 1925 Pa. LEXIS 562
Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Nov 25, 1924
Status
Published
Author
Schaeffer
On the bench
Schaeffer, Moschzisker, Frazer, Walling, Simpson, Kephart, Sadler, Schaefer
Cited by
39 cases

a “higher degree of care” required for the handling of gasoline

How later courts described this case

  • a “higher degree of care” required for the handling of gasoline

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Dissenting Opinion bt

Me. Justice Schaeffer:

The majority of the court has concluded that the judgment recovered by plaintiff is not such an excessive ad-measurement of the compensation to which he is entitled as to warrant our interference with it. I have reached the opposite conclusion and therefore express my dissent.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.