Frix
Try Donna

Opinion

State Ex Rel. Joseph v. Mannix

  • 133 Or. 329
  • 290 P. 745
  • 288 P. 507
  • 1930 Ore. LEXIS 94
Court
Oregon Supreme Court
Filed
Sep 4, 1930
Status
Published
On the bench
Bean, Belt, Brown, Coshow, McBride, Rand, Rossman
Cited by
14 cases

holding that the stat- ute of limitations governing criminal prosecutions is not a defense to a proceeding for suspension or disbarment of a lawyer

How later courts described this case

  • holding that the stat- ute of limitations governing criminal prosecutions is not a defense to a proceeding for suspension or disbarment of a lawyer
  • misrepresentation to court factor in disbarment

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

I adhere to the former opinion that the attorney be suspended from practicing for a period of one year. *Page 388

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.