Opinion

Sterrett v. Hurlburt

  • 129 Or. 520
  • 278 P. 986
  • 275 P. 689
  • 1929 Ore. LEXIS 91
Court
Oregon Supreme Court
Filed
Mar 14, 1929
Status
Published
Author
Belt
On the bench
Bean, Belt, McBride, Coshow, Brown
Cited by
7 cases
Authority
More cited than 0.4%

The opinion

On Petition for Rehearing.

( 278 Pac. 986 .)

BELT, J.

In the main we are satisfied with the conclusion reached in this case, but think it was error to affirm the decree of the lower court without modification, since it was there decreed “that defendants and each of them be permanently enjoined from at any time in the future attempting to cause execution to issue on said judgment.”

Counsel well contends that the defendants should not be deprived of the statutory right to levy on the property in question whenever the homestead is abandoned or relinquished. The decree will be modified so as to enjoin defendants from having execution issue until such time as the homestead is abandoned or relinquished. Neither party will recover costs or disbursements. It is not deemed necessary to order a rehearing thus to modify the decree.

Rehearing Denied. Modified. Respondent's Petition for Rehearing Denied.

Coshow, C. J., and Bean, J., concur.

Brown, J., absent.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.