Later courts went against this
Declined to follow by Joint School Dist. No. 132 v. Dabney, 127 Okla. 234 (1927)
We refuse to follow the definition and distinction of corporations as stated in the case of Honnold v. Board of Commissioners of Carter County et al., 71 Okla. 71, 177 Pac. 71, wherein it is said:
The opinion
On Rehearing.
RAINEY, J.
Since the rehearing was gralmted in this cause we have again 'thoroughly and carefully re-examinejd the opinion and the positions of law advanced in the briefs, and have concluded that Commissioner Davis, who prepared the opinion for .the court, has correctly construed the statute under consideration and that the contract discussed in the opiniion is invalid for the reasons stated therein.
All the Justices concur, eixeept SHARP, C. J., who concurs only in the conclusion.