Opinion

Clark v. Prince

191 Okla. 551
131 P.2d 761
144 A.L.R. 337
1942 OK 399
1942 Okla. LEXIS 282

Court: Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Filed: Dec 1, 1942
Status: Published
Author: Hurst
On the bench: Welch, Osborn, Bay-Less, Gibson, Davison, Arnold, Corn, Hurst, Riley
Cited by: 5 cases

The opinion

HURST, J.

I dissent for the reason that the court does not require a compliance with section 12668, O. S. 1931 (68 O.S.A. § 360) providing for the ascertainment and payment of the amount of taxes prope'rly due, before judgment.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.