Opinion

State v. Myers

  • 143 Ohio App. 3d 342
  • 757 N.E.2d 1258
Court
Ohio Court of Appeals
Filed
May 18, 2001
Status
Published
Author
Brogan
On the bench
Grady, Young, Brogan
Cited by
4 cases
Authority
More cited than 43.5%

The opinion

Brogan, Judge,

concurring.

I concur in Judge Grady’s opinion because the defendant failed to make the preliminary showing required by

Franks v. Delaware

(1978), 438 U.S. 154 , 98 S.Ct. 2674 , 57 L.Ed.2d 667 . I write separately, however, to express my concerns about the trial court’s adoption of “a surveillance location privilege” in this case. I believe that the trial court should carefully consider the factors enunciated in

Roviaro v. United States

(1957), 353 U.S. 53 , 77 S.Ct. 623 , 1 L.Ed.2d 639 , before sustaining the government’s request to prevent disclosure of a surveillance location.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.