Opinion

State v. Schmoll

  • 163 Ohio App. 3d 677
  • 2005 Ohio 5379
  • 839 N.E.2d 995
Court
Ohio Court of Appeals
Filed
Oct 7, 2005
Status
Published
Author
Hoffman
On the bench
Farmer, Gwin, Hoffman
Cited by
3 cases
Authority
More cited than 43.5%

The opinion

Hoffman, Judge,

concurring in part and dissenting in part.

{¶ 73} I concur in the majority’s analysis and disposition of appellant’s first, second, third, and fifth assignments of error.

{¶ 74} I respectfully dissent from the majority’s analysis and disposition of appellant’s fourth assignment of error for the reasons set forth in my dissenting opinion in

State v. Hughett

(Nov. 18, 2004), Delaware App. No. 04-CA-06051, 2004-Ohio-6207 , 2004 WL 2648784 .

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.