Opinion

Columbus Bd. of Edn. v. Fry, Inc.

22 Ohio App. 3d 94
22 Ohio B. 281
489 N.E.2d 294
1984 Ohio App. LEXIS 12694

Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
Filed: Dec 31, 1984
Status: Published
Author: Moyer
On the bench: Whiteside, Hofstetter, Moyer
Cited by: 4 cases
Authority: More cited than 43.4%

The opinion

Moyer, J.,

concurring in part and dissenting in part. I concur with the majority’s opinion to the extent that it overrules the assignment of error with respect to the third-party complaint against Lawrence Associates Architects, but would not sustain the assignment of error with respect to the third-party claims against GAF and Grace because I would not expand the rule of

Iacono

Anderson Concrete Corp.

(1975), 42 Ohio St. 2d 88 [ 71 O.O.2d 66 ], to the distinguishable facts of this case. I would therefore affirm the judgment of the trial court in its entirety.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.