Opinion

In Re Removal of Sites

170 Ohio App. 3d 272
2006 Ohio 6996
866 N.E.2d 1119

Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
Filed: Dec 22, 2006
Status: Published
Author: Harsha
On the bench: Abele, Kline, Harsha
Cited by: 3 cases

The opinion

Harsha, Presiding Judge,

dissenting.

{¶ 35} Upon consideration of the briefs, it appears that the appeal does not present us with a question of law as required by R.C. 3.09. Thus, I would not address the merits but rather would dismiss the appeal as having been improvidently granted.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.