Opinion

Dennis v. Board of Trustees, Unpublished Decision (10-31-2005)

  • 2005 Ohio 5951
Court
Ohio Court of Appeals
Filed
Oct 31, 2005
Status
Unpublished
On the bench
FARMER, P.J.
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

{¶ 29} I respectfully dissent from the majority's analysis and disposition of appellant's first and third assignments of error.

{¶ 30} The majority, in its analysis and disposition of the first assignment, holds that appellant's due process rights had not been violated. I disagree.

{¶ 31} In the case sub judice, appellees voted two(2) to one (1) in favor of removing appellant as chief. Trustee Bailey who voted in favor of removal, relied on issues other than appellant's failure to file the reports in voting for appellant's removal. The following is an excerpt from Trustee Bailey's testimony:

{¶ 32} "Q. I'll restate the question, Mr. Bailey. During his tenure as the fire chief, do you think that Mark Dennis was actively participating in doing his duties as the fire chief, other than the — aside from the fire report issue?

{¶ 33} "A. No.

{¶ 34} "Q. Okay. Despite your answer to that question, it's correct that the only complaint that was filed for the removal of Mr. Dennis was the failure to file the reports; correct?

{¶ 35} "A. Yeah.

{¶ 36} "Q. Is it fair to say that in your decision to remove Mark Dennis, that you used those other factors that he was not doing to remove him?

{¶ 37} "A. Yes.

{¶ 38} "THE COURT: Was that a yes or no?

{¶ 39} "THE WITNESS: Yes.

{¶ 40} "Q. So you decided to remove Mr. Dennis on issues other than those alleged in the complaint; correct?

{¶ 41} "A. No.

{¶ 42} "Q. No? Well, you just said to me that —

{¶ 43} "A. Well, I considered them too along with the reports.

{¶ 44} "Q. Okay. So in your decision to remove Mr. Dennis, you considered matters other than the failure to file the reports to remove him; correct?

{¶ 45} "A. Yes." Transcript at 97 — 98.

{¶ 46} There is no evidence that Trustee Bailey would have voted for appellant's removal based solely on appellant's failure to file the reports.

{¶ 47} I would find, therefore, that appellant's right to procedural and substantive due process was violated, and would find that the trial court erred in affirming appellee's decision to remove appellant as fire chief.

{¶ 48} Based on the preceding analysis, I would vote to reverse the decision of the trial court.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.