Opinion

Clow v. . McNeill

  • 167 N.C. 212
  • 83 S.E. 308
  • 1914 N.C. LEXIS 87
Court
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Filed
Nov 5, 1914
Status
Published
On the bench
AlleN, Allen
Cited by
3 cases
Authority
More cited than 42.4%

The opinion

The objection to the order continuing the restraining order is upon the ground that, as the action had been removed to the county of Lee, the judge holding the court of the county of Cumberland was without jurisdiction.

In our opinion, his Honor had the power to make the order, notwithstanding the removal, as the court had jurisdiction until the action was removed ( Comrs. v. Lemly , 85 N.C. 341 ); but it is unnecessary to decide the question, as we have held upon the plaintiff's appeal that the action was properly constituted in the county of Cumberland.

Affirmed.

Cited: Piano Co. v. Newell , 177 N.C. 535 (1c); Fairley v. Abernathy , 190 N.C. 498 (1d); Marshburn v. Purifoy , 222 N.C. 222 (1d).

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.