“If, without deciding, the recited purchase of stock is not a consideration supporting respondent’s hiring of 11 appellant, the other consideration of mutual promises [to hire and to serve] is sufficient ….”
How later courts described this case
- “If, without deciding, the recited purchase of stock is not a consideration supporting respondent’s hiring of 11 appellant, the other consideration of mutual promises [to hire and to serve] is sufficient ….”
- “If, without deciding, the recited purchase of stock is not a consideration supporting respondent’s hiring of appellant, the other consideration of mutual promises [to hire and to serve] is sufficient....”
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
The foregoing opinion by FITZSIMMONS, C., is adopted as the opinion of the court. All of the judges concur.