Opinion

King v. Priest

  • 357 Mo. 68
  • 206 S.W.2d 547
  • 1947 Mo. LEXIS 689
Court
Supreme Court of Missouri
Filed
Nov 10, 1947
Status
Published
Author
Douglas
On the bench
Dalton, Leedy, Hyde, Ellison, Conkling, Douglas, Clark, Tipton
Cited by
42 cases

The opinion

DOUGLAS, J.

(concurring). — I concur in the result reached in the principal opinion. In City of Springfield v. Clouse this court held that Section 29, Article I of the Constitution of 1945 does not apply to public employees, not because of a doctrine of [558] statutory construction as 'held in the principal opinion, which doctrine in my view cannot be employed to nullify a provision of a bill of rights, but because the very purpose of Section 29, Article I makes it. legally impossible of application to public employees.

The principal opinion in this case deals with Rule- 23, Section 342 only on the issues involved in this case. Under the general police powers of the state, the Board of Public Commissioners are empowered in their discretion to forbid members of the police department to join a union.

However, I gravely doubt that Rule 23, Section 342 could be upheld in its entirety. It seems to be so broad as to place unreasonable restrictions on the rights of members of the police department as citizens to meet and to join organizations, the purpose of which would not be inconsistent with proper police discipline or inimical to public welfare.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.