the court did not reverse, but trial courts were warned to adhere to established practice, when each side was given four strikes where (1) none of the "extra” panelists served on the jury, (2) none appeared unqualified or biased, and (3) it did not appear the verdict would have been any different
How later courts described this case
- the court did not reverse, but trial courts were warned to adhere to established practice, when each side was given four strikes where (1) none of the "extra” panelists served on the jury, (2) none appeared unqualified or biased, and (3) it did not appear the verdict would have been any different
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
The foregoing opinion of SEDDON, C., is adopted as the opinion of the court. All of the judges concur; Graves, J., in the result. *Page 48