Opinion

Gillen v. Bayfield

  • 329 Mo. 681
  • 46 S.W.2d 571
  • 1932 Mo. LEXIS 756
Court
Supreme Court of Missouri
Filed
Feb 11, 1932
Status
Published
On the bench
Ferguson, Hyde, Sturgis
Cited by
24 cases

describing assent as "essential to the formation of the contract." (emphasis added)

How later courts described this case

  • describing assent as "essential to the formation of the contract." (emphasis added)

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

The foregoing opinion by HYDE, C., is adopted as the opinion of the court. All of the judges concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.