holding that the State was not required to accept a judicial admission or stipulation of the defendant and may insist on proving a fact with testimony from a live witness
How later courts described this case
- holding that the State was not required to accept a judicial admission or stipulation of the defendant and may insist on proving a fact with testimony from a live witness
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
The foregoing opinion by COOLEY, C., is adopted as the opinion of the court. All the judges concur.