Opinion

State v. Ocean Shore Improvement District

  • 116 Fla. 284
  • 156 So. 433
  • 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1041
Court
Supreme Court of Florida
Filed
Apr 3, 1934
Status
Published
On the bench
Davis, Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell, Brown, Buford
Cited by
12 cases

The opinion

On Petition for Rehearing

Per Curiam.

On petition for rehearing, the constitutional validity of Chapter 10013, Acts of 1923, Chapter 10952, Acts of 1925, and Chapter 14776, Acts of 1931, are again vigorously challenged. The court has at great pains and labor reviewed these acts and the entire record in the cause. In the light, of developments since their enactment, the provisions and assessments imposed by them will no doubt work a hardship on many of the landowners but this is not a cause that the court can now relieve against. We have examined every question raised and are conscious of no reason for changing our opinion as formerly expressed.

It is accordingly affirmed on rehearing.

. Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.