Opinion

Ex Parte Amos

  • 93 Fla. 4
  • 112 So. 289
Court
Supreme Court of Florida
Filed
Jan 11, 1927
Status
Published
On the bench
ELLIS, C. J. —
Cited by
67 cases
Authority
More cited than 37.6%

under rule of ejusdem generis, use of general term following terms evidently confined and limited to a particular class of things embraces only things of the same kind as described by the limited terms

How later courts described this case

  • under rule of ejusdem generis, use of general term following terms evidently confined and limited to a particular class of things embraces only things of the same kind as described by the limited terms
  • J. Whitfield concurring opinion at 294

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

I am unable to reconcile the majority opinion herein with the former opinion of this Court in Kirkland v. State, 86 Fla. 130 ; 97 So.2d Rep. 510, in respect to the construction to be placed under Section 5354, Revised General Statutes 1920.

I therefore dissent, but express no opinion as to whether the indictment herein is good as against a motion to quash.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.