Opinion

State Ex Rel. Diamond v. Cone

  • 130 Fla. 219
  • 177 So. 878
Court
Supreme Court of Florida
Filed
Oct 6, 1937
Status
Published
Author
Buford
On the bench
Teeeell, Whitfield, Chapman, Brown, Buford, Ellis
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Buford, J.

(concurring specially).—I concur in the judgment stated at the conclusion of the opinion prepared by Mr. Justice Terrell, but it is my view that this case is in all respects like the case of State,

ex rel.

A. L. Wilson,

et al.,

v. Fred P. Cone,

et al.,

decided at this Term, and,’therefore, because of the reasons stated for the conclusion reached by me in that case, I think the alternative writ here should be quashed, with leave to the Relators to amend so as to come within the purview of the provisions of Chapter 15659, Acts of 1931, as to the balance due Santa Rosa County under the provisions of that Act, which the records in the office of the State Treasurer show to be in the sum of $82,047.32 as and when the same becomes available.

Ellis, C. J., and Brown, J., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.