Opinion

State Ex Rel. Diamond v. Cone

  • 130 Fla. 219
  • 177 So. 878
Court
Supreme Court of Florida
Filed
Oct 6, 1937
Status
Published
Author
Teeeell
On the bench
Teeeell, Whitfield, Chapman, Brown, Buford, Ellis
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Teeeell, J.

The facts in this case are in point with those in the companion case of State,

ex rel.

A. L. Wilson,

et al.,

as Board of County Commissioners of Gadsden County, v. Fred P. Cone, J. M. Lee, and W. V. Knott,

et al.,

as State Board of Administration, decided this date. The Act relied on, Chapter 17972, Acts of 1937, is the same type of Act and operates in the same manner as Chapter 17042, and Chapter 17034, Acts of 1935, relied on in the companion case of State,

ex rel.

J. R. Mayo,

et al.,

as Board of County Commissioners of Calhoun County, v. J. M. Lee,

et al.,

decided this date.

The basis of classification being similar, what we said in the foregoing styled cases and the case of State,

ex rel.

O. J. Harrell,

et al.,

as Board of County Commissioners of Washington County, v. Fred P. Cone, J. M. Lee, and W. V. Knott,

et al.,

as State Board of Administration, decided this date, is conclusive of all questions raised in this case.

The motion to quash the alternative writ is accordingly granted with leave to amend the alternative writ.

*220

It is so ordered.

Whitfield and Chapman, J. J., concur.

.Ellis, C. J., and Brown and Buford, J. J., concur specially.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.