Opinion

Van Loenen v. Gillespie

  • 152 Cal. 222
  • 96 P. 87
  • 1907 Cal. LEXIS 332
Court
California Supreme Court
Filed
Oct 22, 1907
Status
Published
On the bench
Henshaw
Cited by
4 cases
Authority
More cited than 73.7%

The opinion

THE COURT.

It is ordered that the opinion heretofore rendered by this court in Department Two in this case is adopted as the opinion by the court in Bank, and judgment affirmed accordingly.

Shaw, J., and Lorigan, J., dissented for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in

Woollacott

v.

Meekins,

151 Cal. 701 , heretofore denied by the court in Bank:—

The following is the opinion of Department Two, rendered on the fourth day of April, 1907, and adopted by the court in Bank:—

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.