Opinion

Weisman v. Board of Building & Safety Commissioners

  • 85 Cal. App. 493
  • 259 P. 768
  • 1927 Cal. App. LEXIS 492
Court
California Court of Appeal
Filed
Sep 19, 1927
Status
Published
Author
Collier
On the bench
Collier, Craig
Cited by
6 cases
Authority
More cited than 43.9%

The opinion

COLLIER, J.,

pro tem.

I concur in the judgment of affirmance. “It has been held by this court that there is a material difference between the

rendition

and the

entry

of a judgment. A judgment is rendered when it is announced by the court. It is entered when it is actually entered in the judgment book.”

(Schurtz

v.

Romer,

81 Cal. 244, 247 [ 22 Pac. 657 ].)

“The enforcement of a judgment does not depend upon its entry or docketing. These are merely ministerial acts. ...”

(Los Angeles County Bank

v.

Raynor,

61 Cal. 145, 147 . See, also,

Otto

v.

Long,

144 Cal. 144, 146 [ 77 Pac. 885 ];

Janes

v.

Ballard,

107 Cal. 130, 132 [ 40 Pac. 108 ].)

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.