Opinion

James Eva Estate v. Oakland B. M. Co.

  • 40 Cal. App. 515
  • 181 P. 415
  • 1919 Cal. App. LEXIS 155
Court
California Court of Appeal
Filed
Apr 1, 1919
Status
Published
On the bench
Haven
Cited by
11 cases

The opinion

In view of the circumstances disclosed by the evidence in this case, including the recital in the resolution adopted by the directors of the appellant corporation to the effect that it is for the best interests of the corporation that the lessee shall secure the rights and privileges of the lease, we are satisfied that there was a sufficient showing of benefit to appellant corporation to make its undertaking valid. We express no opinion on the question of burden of proof discussed in the opinion.

The application for a hearing in this matter after decision by the district court of appeal of the first appellate district, Division Two, is denied.

All the Justices concurred, except Wilbur, J., who was absent. *Page 521

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.