Opinion

Grand Lodge, K. P. v. Shorter

  • 219 Ala. 293
  • 122 So. 36
  • 1929 Ala. LEXIS 172
Court
Supreme Court of Alabama
Filed
Jan 31, 1929
Status
Published
On the bench
Anderson, Bouldin, Brown, Foster, Gardner, Poster, Sayre, Thomas
Cited by
18 cases

The opinion

In the event of an amendment of the bill adding the parties whom this court has found to be necessary, and an application for a continuation of the receivership, the court below will consider and determine the merits of such application, as they may then appear, after giving the added parties, as well as the others, an opportunity then to be heard.

With the foregoing statement, the application for rehearing is overruled.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.