Opinion

Lanier v. Henderson

  • 227 Ala. 243
  • 149 So. 674
  • 1933 Ala. LEXIS 215
Court
Supreme Court of Alabama
Filed
May 11, 1933
Status
Published
Author
Thomas
On the bench
Anderson, Brown, Knight, Thomas
Cited by
5 cases
Authority
More cited than 43.8%

The opinion

On Rehearing.

THOMAS, Justice.

It was held in Lamar v. Lincoln Reserve Life Ins. Co., 222 Ala. 60 , 131 So. 223 , that third parties not parties to the suit cannot be brought in by a statutory cross-bill; that in such case the filing of the original bill in the nature of a cross-bill is the approved practice.

This point, however, was not taken by the demurrer to the cross-bill; 'and on further consideration the trial court was in error in sustaining the stated grounds of demurrer of

*245

Henderson to the cross-bill, and for this error the decree of the circuit court is due to be reversed. We are, however, clear to the conclusion that the two suits should be consolidated by the' court

ex

mero motu, or on due motion by counsel.

It results that the application for rehearing is granted, the judgment of affirmance is set aside, and the decree of the circuit court is reversed, and the cause is remanded.

Rehearing granted; reversed and remanded.

ANDERSON, C. J., and BROWN and KNIGHT, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.