Opinion

Hodges v. Wells

  • 226 Ala. 558
  • 147 So. 672
  • 1932 Ala. LEXIS 3
Court
Supreme Court of Alabama
Filed
Dec 8, 1932
Status
Published
Author
Thomas
On the bench
Thomas, Anderson, Brown, Knight
Cited by
15 cases

Alabama Motor Carrier Act of 1927, § 5, p. 312-313, expressly provided that “every such insurance policy shall be for the benefit of and subject to action thereon *1093 by any person who shall sustain an actionable injury protected thereby, notwithstanding any provision in such insurance policy to the contrary”

How later courts described this case

  • Alabama Motor Carrier Act of 1927, § 5, p. 312-313, expressly provided that “every such insurance policy shall be for the benefit of and subject to action thereon *1093 by any person who shall sustain an actionable injury protected thereby, notwithstanding any provision in such insurance policy to the contrary”

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

On Rehearing.

THOMAS, Justice.

We rest the judgment of reversal on the errors indicated on the original hearing, as committed on the trial in- exclusion of the evidence.

All the Justices concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.