Opinion

People v. Johnson

  • 30 N.Y.2d 929
  • 335 N.Y.S.2d 684
  • 287 N.E.2d 378
  • 1972 N.Y. LEXIS 1137
Court
New York Court of Appeals
Filed
Jul 7, 1972
Status
Published
Cited by
17 cases
Authority
More cited than 29.9%

The opinion

30 N.Y.2d 929 (1972)

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v.

James Johnson, Also Known as Walter Brown, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued June 8, 1972.

Decided July 7, 1972.

G. Jeffrey Sorge , James J. McDonough and Matthew Muraskin for appellant.

William Cahn , District Attorney ( Henry P. DeVine of counsel), for respondent.

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, BREITEL, JASEN and GIBSON.

Order reversed and the information dismissed in the following memorandum: On the record before us, neither the stop nor the frisk of appellant was justified by reasonable suspicions on the part of the police. (Code Crim. Pro., § 180-a; Sibron v. New York , 392 U. S. 40 ; Terry v. Ohio , 392 U. S. 1 .) Absent an articulable foundation for the entrenchment upon individual liberty and privacy which a stop and frisk entails, police suspicions remain merely "hunches" and are not reasonable within section 180-a of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Cf. People v. Arthurs , 24 N Y 2d 688; People v. Taggart , 20 N Y 2d 335.) Accordingly, the conviction of appellant should be reversed and the information dismissed.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.