Opinion

Woods v. MIAMI-DADE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD

  • 41 So. 3d 995
  • 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 11270
  • 2010 WL 3023384
Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Filed
Aug 4, 2010
Status
Published
On the bench
Cope and Salter, Jj., and Schwartz, Senior Judge
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 37.2%

The opinion

41 So.3d 995 (2010)

Monique S. WOODS, Appellant,

v.

MIAMI-DADE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, Appellee.

No. 3D09-3034.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

August 4, 2010.

Kelly & McKee and Melissa C. Mihok, for appellant.

Walter J. Harvey, School Board Attorney, and Arianne B. Suarez, Assistant Attorney, for appellee.

Before COPE and SALTER, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Criminal Justice Standards and Training Commission v. Bradley, 596 So.2d 661 (Fla.1992); Chase v. Pinellas County School Board, 597 So.2d 419 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). See also § 120.68, Fla. Stat. (2009).

SALTER, J., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge, concur.

COPE, J. (dissenting).

We should reverse the order now before us. The School Board failed to follow the procedures required by the Florida Administrative Procedure Act (APA). See § 120.57(1)( l ), Fla. Stat. (2009). The School Board's order rests on an entirely erroneous conception of APA law. All the School Board needed to do in this case was to prepare an order which tracked the terms of Criminal Justice Standards & Training Commission v. Bradley, 596 So.2d 661 (Fla.1992), but the School Board failed to do so.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.