Price Optimization, July 9, 2015
WashingtonAgency guidance
Ask Donna
How this section applies to your facts.
Washington OIC Technical Assistance Advisories and Emergency Orders › Price Optimization, July 9, 2015
Text
STATE OF WASHINGTON
MIKE KREIDLER
OLYMPIA OFFICE:
STATE INSURANCE COMMISSIONER
INSURANCE BUILDING
P.O. BOX 40258
OLYMPIA, WA 98504-0258
Phone: (360) 725-7000
OFFICE OF
INSURANCE COMMISSIONER
Technical Assistance Advisory 2015-011
TO:
Property and Casualty Insurers Doing Business in Washington State
FROM:
Insurance Commissioner Mike Kreidler
DATE:
July 9, 2015
SUBJECT:
Price Optimization
In general, the practice of price optimization involves an insurer’s use of sophisticated statistical analysis, often
using non-insurance data, to predict a policyholder’s likelihood of renewing a policy.
One example is using statistical analysis of consumer behavior to determine the premium a policyholder would
be willing to pay at renewal before he or she engages in comparison shopping. This practice can result in two
policyholders receiving different premium increases, even though they have the same loss history and risk
profile. It can also result in increased costs for policyholders who keep their business with the same insurer—in
other words, a loyalty penalty.
Washington State law requires that premium rates for insurance not be excessive, inadequate, or unfairly
discriminatory.2 A rate is not unfairly discriminatory if it is an actuarially sound estimate of the expected
value of all future costs associated with an individual risk transfer.3 Thus rates must be based on cost
associated with risk. Charging higher rates to certain consumers based on their willingness to look
elsewhere for insurance does not reflect a genuine increased cost incurred by the insurer.
To the extent that an insurer’s use of price optimization results in premiums, rates, or rating factors
unrelated to cost and risk, it will be considered unfairly discriminatory and in violation of Washington
State law. The OIC will not approve unfairly discriminatory rates
n their willingness to look
elsewhere for insurance does not reflect a genuine increased cost incurred by the insurer.
To the extent that an insurer’s use of price optimization results in premiums, rates, or rating factors
unrelated to cost and risk, it will be considered unfairly discriminatory and in violation of Washington
State law. The OIC will not approve unfairly discriminatory rates.
Please direct any questions about this advisory to Lee Barclay, Senior Actuary, at leeb@oic.wa.gov, or at 360-
725-7115.
1 This advisory is an interpretive policy statement released to advise the public of the OIC’s current opinions, approaches, and likely
courses of action. It is advisory only. RCW 34.05.230(1).
2 RCW 48.19.020
3 WAC 284-24-065(1)
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.