Employment-Based Applicant Not in Lawful Nonimmigrant Status (INA 245(c)(7))

FederalAgency guidance

Ask Donna

How this section applies to your facts.

USCIS Policy Manual › Volume 7 - Adjustment of Status › Part B - 245(a) Adjustment › USCIS Policy Manual, Vol. 7, Pt. B, Ch. 5

This text was captured on Aug 14, 2026. It is a snapshot, not a live feed, so check the official code before relying on it.

Text

Any employment-based adjustment applicant who is not in a lawful nonimmigrant status at the time of filing for adjustment is barred from adjusting status, even if the applicant is lawfully present in the United States. [1] For example, a parolee is barred from seeking employment-based adjustment, because a parolee is not a lawful nonimmigrant status. [2]

Employment-based applicants may be eligible for exemption from this bar under INA 245(k) . [3] The INA 245(c)(7) bar also does not apply to Violence Against Women Act (VAWA)-based applicants, immediate relatives, family-based applicants, special immigrant juveniles, or certain members of the U.S. armed forces because these applicants are not seeking adjustment as employment-based applicants. [4]

For purposes of this bar to adjustment, the term “lawful nonimmigrant status” refers to:

- An applicant in a lawful status classified under the nonimmigrant statutory provisions; [5] and

- An applicant in temporary protected status. [6]

Lawful nonimmigrant status does not include parolees, asylees, or certain other aliens who are otherwise authorized to be physically present in the United States.

Period of Time to Consider and Effect of Departure

In determining whether this adjustment bar applies, an officer should only consider the applicant’s immigration status on the date the applicant filed the current adjustment application. Any time the applicant was not in lawful status prior to filing the adjustment application is irrelevant for INA 245(c)(7) purposes.

Furthermore, this bar does not apply to applicants who were in a lawful nonimmigrant status at the time of filing for adjustment, subsequently left the United States, and returned using an approved advance parole travel document while the adjustment application remains pending. Advance parole simply allows the applicant to resume the processing of the adjustment application without abandoning the application because of a brief departure.

pplicants who were in a lawful nonimmigrant status at the time of filing for adjustment, subsequently left the United States, and returned using an approved advance parole travel document while the adjustment application remains pending. Advance parole simply allows the applicant to resume the processing of the adjustment application without abandoning the application because of a brief departure.

The examples below highlight when this adjustment bar applies and when it does not apply.

In this case, even though the applicant had previously been a B-2 nonimmigrant, the applicant was a parolee at the time of filing for adjustment of status. Therefore, INA 245(c)(7) bars the applicant from adjustment of status as the beneficiary of an employment-based petition.

In this case, the applicant stayed past the time authorized to remain in the United States and was not in a valid nonimmigrant status at the time his adjustment application is filed. INA 245(c)(7) bars the applicant from adjusting status under an employment basis. The applicant, however, may qualify for the INA 245(k) exemption. [7]

In this instance, the adjustment application is properly filed before expiration of the applicant’s H-2B nonimmigrant status. Even though the adjustment applicant departs and returns to the United States using the advance parole document, the INA 245(c)(7) bar does not apply to the applicant.

Footnotes

[1] See 8 CFR 245.1(b)(9) .

[2] This bar does not apply to applicants who were in a lawful nonimmigrant status at the time of filing for adjustment, subsequently left the United States on advance parole, and subsequently were paroled into the United States upon return while the adjustment application remains pending. The parole simply allows the applicant to resume the processing of the adjustment application without having the application considered abandoned due to a brief departure. See 62 FR 39417, 39421 (PDF) (Jul. 23, 1997).

adjustment, subsequently left the United States on advance parole, and subsequently were paroled into the United States upon return while the adjustment application remains pending. The parole simply allows the applicant to resume the processing of the adjustment application without having the application considered abandoned due to a brief departure. See 62 FR 39417, 39421 (PDF) (Jul. 23, 1997).

[3] See Chapter 8, Inapplicability of Bars to Adjustment, Section E, Employment-Based Exemption under INA 245(k) [ 7 USCIS-PM B.8(E) ].

[4] See 8 CFR 245.1(b)(9) .

[5] See INA 101(a)(15) .

[6] See INA 244(f)(4) . See 8 CFR 244.10(f)(2)(iv)-(v) .

[7] See Chapter 8, Inapplicability of Bars to Adjustment, Section E, Employment-Based Exemption under INA 245(k) [ 7 USCIS-PM B.8(E) ].

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.

Employment-Based Applicant Not in Lawful Nonimmigrant Status (INA 245(c)(7)) · USCIS Policy Manual, Vol. 7, Pt. B, Ch. 5 | Frix