Inquiry Regarding Use in Commerce
FederalAgency guidance
Ask Donna
How this section applies to your facts.
USPTO TMEP › Chapter 0900 - Use in Commerce › TMEP § 901.04
Text
It is the responsibility of the applicant and the
applicant’s attorney to determine whether an assertion of use in commerce is
supported by the relevant facts. The validity of an applicant’s assertion of use in
commerce generally does not arise in ex parte examination. The examining attorney
will normally accept the applicant’s verified claim of use in commerce without
investigation into whether the use referred to constitutes “use in commerce.”
An applicant is not required to specify the type of
commerce in which the mark is used.
See
TMEP §901.03
.
However, if the applicant specifically states that the mark is in use in commerce
that cannot be regulated by the U.S. Congress, the applicant has not met the
statutory requirement for a verified statement that the mark is in use in commerce,
and a specification of the date of first use in commerce, as defined in §45 of the
Trademark Act. Accordingly, the examining attorney must advise the applicant that
it appears that the mark is not in use in a type of commerce that can be regulated
by the U.S. Congress and must require that the applicant either submit a verified
statement that “the mark is in use in commerce that can be regulated by the U.S.
Congress,” or amend the basis of the application to a bona fide intention to use the
mark in commerce under §1(b) of the Act, if permitted by
37 C.F.R.
§2.35
. See
TMEP §806.03(c)
regarding
amendment of the basis from §1(a) to §1(b).
If the application record contains evidence or
information indicating that the mark may not be in use in commerce that “may
lawfully be regulated by Congress,” the examining attorney must ask the applicant
whether there is use in commerce that may lawfully be regulated by the U.S. Congress
and require a satisfactory explanation or showing of such use. The examining
attorney may also require additional information or evidence concerning the use of
the mark to permit full consideration of the issue.
37 C.F.R.
§2.61(b)
;
TMEP §814.
[top]
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.