No Explanation of Use of Mark by Related Companies or Applicant’s Control Over Use of Mark by Related Companies Required
FederalAgency guidance
Ask Donna
How this section applies to your facts.
USPTO TMEP › Chapter 1200 - Substantive Examination of Applications › TMEP § 1201.03(a)
Text
The USPTO does not require an application to
specify if the applied-for mark is not being used by the applicant but is being
used by one or more related companies whose use inures to the benefit of the
applicant under §5 of the Act. Moreover, where the application states that use
of the mark is by a related company or companies, the USPTO does not require an
explanation of how the applicant controls the use of the mark.
Additionally, the USPTO does not inquire about the
relationship between the applicant and other parties named on the specimen or
elsewhere in the record, except when the reference to another party clearly
contradicts the applicant’s verified statement that it is the owner of the mark
or has a bona fide intention to use the mark in commerce.
See
TMEP
§1201.04
. In such cases, the USPTO may require such
details concerning the nature of the relationship and such proofs as may be
necessary and appropriate for the purpose of showing that the use by related
companies inures to the benefit of the applicant and does not affect the
validity of the mark.
37 C.F.R.
§2.38(b)
.
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.