Vesting of title in agency; vesting of right to just compensation; delay or denial.

MichiganStatutes

Ask Donna

How this section applies to your facts.

MI Code › Chapter 213 › Act Act-87-of-1980 › Section 213.57

This text was captured on Aug 14, 2026. It is a snapshot, not a live feed, so check the official code before relying on it.

Text

Sec. 7.

If a motion to review necessity is not filed under section 6, the title to the property described in the petition shall vest in the agency as of the date on which the complaint was filed. The right to just compensation shall then vest in the persons entitled to the compensation and be secured as provided in this act. If the motion to review necessity is denied after a hearing and after any further right to appeal has terminated, title to the property shall also vest in the agency as of the date on which the complaint was filed or such other date as the court may set upon motion of the agency.

Vesting of title in the agency shall not be delayed or denied because of any of the following:

A motion filed under section 6a, challenging the agency's election to reserve its rights to bring federal or state cost recovery actions.

A motion challenging the agency's escrow under section 8.

An allegation that the agency should have offered a higher amount for the property.

An allegation that the agency should have included additional property in its good faith written offer.

Any other reason except a challenge to the necessity of the acquisition filed under section 6.

History: 1980, Act 87, Imd. Eff. Apr. 8, 1980; Am. 1993, Act 308, Eff. Jan. 28, 1994; Am. 1996, Act 474, Imd. Eff. Dec. 26, 1996

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.