Section 1150.95 Architecture Complaint Committee

IllinoisRegulations

Ask Donna

How this section applies to your facts.

Illinois Administrative Code › Title 68 PROFESSIONS AND OCCUPATIONS › CHAPTER VII: DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION › Part 1150 ILLINOIS ARCHITECTURE PRACTICE ACT OF 1989 › Section 1150.95 Architecture Complaint Committee

This text was captured on Aug 14, 2026. It is a snapshot, not a live feed, so check the official code before relying on it.

Text

Section 1150

Section 1150.95  Architecture

Complaint Committee

a)         The Architecture Complaint Committee of the Architecture

Licensing Board, authorized by Sections 10 and 24 of the Act, shall be composed

of at least 2 members of the Architecture Licensing Board, a Supervisor over

Design Investigations and a Chief of Prosecutions over Design Prosecutions.

The Director of Enforcement shall designate the Supervisor and Chief assigned

to the Complaint Committee.

b)         The Complaint Committee shall meet at least once every 2

months to exercise its functions and duties set forth in subsection (c).  The

Complaint Committee may meet concurrently with the Complaint Committees of the

Land Surveyors Examining Board, the State Board of Professional Engineers and

the Structural Engineering Board to discuss interrelated professional matters.

The Complaint Committee shall make every effort to consider expeditiously and

take prompt action on each item on its agenda.

c)         The Complaint Committee shall have the following duties and

functions:

1)         To review investigative case files after an initial inquiry

into the involved parties and their licensure status have been obtained.

"Case file" means the allegation made against an involved party that

resulted in a preliminary inquiry and other information being obtained in order

to determine whether an investigation should be initiated or prosecution

pursued.  A "Formal Complaint" means the notice of allegations and

charges or basis for licensure denial that begins the formal proceedings.

2)         To refer the case file to the Supervisor over the Design

Investigators for further action.  The Complaint Committee shall give the

Supervisor an indication as to the prosecutorial merit and relative severity of

the allegations to aid in the prioritization of investigative activity.

3)         To recommend that a case file be closed.

4)         To recommend that an Administrative Warning Letter be issued

and the case file closed

visor over the Design

Investigators for further action.  The Complaint Committee shall give the

Supervisor an indication as to the prosecutorial merit and relative severity of

the allegations to aid in the prioritization of investigative activity.

3)         To recommend that a case file be closed.

4)         To recommend that an Administrative Warning Letter be issued

and the case file closed.

5)         To refer the case file to Prosecutions for review and action.

6)         To report the actions of the Complaint Committee at each Board

meeting and to present enforcement statistics such as the type of alleged

violation.

d)         In determining what action to take or whether to proceed with

investigation and prosecution of a case file, the Complaint Committee shall

consider the following factors, but not be limited to:  the effect on the

public's health, safety and welfare; the sufficiency of the evidence presented;

prosecutorial merit; and sufficient cooperation from complaining parties.

e)         At any time after referral to Prosecutions, the Division may enter

into negotiations to resolve issues informally by way of a Consent Order.

Factors to be considered in deciding whether to enter into settlement

negotiations shall include, but not be limited to:  the effect on the public's

health, safety and welfare caused by the respondent's alleged conduct;

sufficient investigation of the case; prosecutorial merit; relative severity of

the respondent's alleged conduct; and past practices of the Division.

f)         No file shall be closed nor Formal Complaint dismissed except

upon recommendation of the Complaint Committee and/or approval by the

Architecture Licensing Board.  Those case files that previously have been

before the Board and are the subject of a Consent Order or Formal Order of the

Director may be closed without further recommendation or approval of the

Architecture Licensing Board or the Complaint Committee

losed nor Formal Complaint dismissed except

upon recommendation of the Complaint Committee and/or approval by the

Architecture Licensing Board.  Those case files that previously have been

before the Board and are the subject of a Consent Order or Formal Order of the

Director may be closed without further recommendation or approval of the

Architecture Licensing Board or the Complaint Committee.

g)         Complaints Involving Imminent Danger to the Public

1)         When a complaint is made to the Division that alleges that a

building, or other structure that requires the involvement of an architect in

its design, is under construction, construction is imminent, or construction

has been completed, and an architect is not or was not involved in its design,

the investigation of that complaint shall be expedited to ensure the health and

safety of the public.  This investigation will be referred to as an

"Emergency Investigation".

2)         An Emergency Investigation will be given priority attention

and assigned to an investigator as soon as possible.

3)         Once assigned to an investigator, the Division, through its investigator,

will convene a meeting of the Complaint Committee by teleconference to

determine if the complaint shall continue to be treated as an Emergency

Investigation.  Such meetings will be deemed an emergency and notice of the

meeting shall be provided in accordance with the Open Meetings Act.

4)         Upon determination by the Complaint Committee that the

complaint should be treated as an Emergency Investigation, the complaint will

be investigated as soon as possible.

5)         Upon completion of the Emergency Investigation, the

investigator will again convene a meeting of the Complaint Committee by

teleconference.  This meeting shall also be considered an emergency and notice

of the meeting shall be provided in accordance with the Open Meetings Act

int should be treated as an Emergency Investigation, the complaint will

be investigated as soon as possible.

5)         Upon completion of the Emergency Investigation, the

investigator will again convene a meeting of the Complaint Committee by

teleconference.  This meeting shall also be considered an emergency and notice

of the meeting shall be provided in accordance with the Open Meetings Act.  The

Complaint Committee will then decide whether to recommend to the Division that

the complaint be referred to the Attorney General to seek a temporary

restraining order and permanent injunction against the start or further

construction of the project or, when the project has already been completed, to

enjoin the use of the building or structure.  The Complaint Committee will

recommend that the case be referred to the Attorney General only upon a finding

that the facts alleged in the complaint are credible and constitute an imminent

danger to the public.

h)        Disqualification of an Architecture Licensing Board member.

1)         A Board member shall be recused from consideration of a case

file or Formal Complaint when the Board member determines that a conflict of

interest or prejudice would prevent that Board member from being fair and

impartial.

2)         Participation in the initial stages of the handling of a case

file, including participation on the Complaint Committee and in informal

conferences, shall not bar a Board member from future participation or decision

making relating to that case file.

i)          An informal conference is the procedure established by the Division

that may be used for compliance review, fact finding, discussion of the issues,

resolving case files, licensing issues or conflicts prior to initiating any

Formal Complaint or formal hearing.  An informal conference may only be

conducted upon agreement of both parties.  Informal conferences shall be

conducted by a Division attorney and shall include a member or members of the

Board

Division

that may be used for compliance review, fact finding, discussion of the issues,

resolving case files, licensing issues or conflicts prior to initiating any

Formal Complaint or formal hearing.  An informal conference may only be

conducted upon agreement of both parties.  Informal conferences shall be

conducted by a Division attorney and shall include a member or members of the

Board.  Board members shall be scheduled for informal conferences on a rotating

basis.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.