SSR 76-42: Rescinded 1985
FederalRulings
Ask Donna
How this section applies to your facts.
Social Security Rulings › SSI › Eligibility › SSR 76-42
Text
20 CFR 416.1003(c), 416.1005(a)(1), 416.1007, 416.1035, and
416.1185(a)
SR 76-42
The claimant lives in the same household with a person of the opposite sex
and they are known throughout the community in which they live as man and
wife. The claimant contends she is not in a husband-wife relationship with
the person with whom she has been living because she is still legally
married to another man. Held , the claimant is determined to be in a
marital relationship for Supplemental Security Income purposes as defined
by Section 1614(d)(2) of the Social Security Act, as amended.
The claimant stated that she has lived with W since 1945 following a
separation from her lawful husband. "I began living with W and have lived
with him since then (1945)—although we have never been married. W
and I have four children; two of them still live at home with us. He lists
me as his wife on his income tax returns, we have a joint checking account
and our car is in both our names."
A copy of W's wage and tax statement discloses that he earned $15,501.95
in 1974. In addition, a receipt of rent disclosed that the lessor of the
claimant's premises referred to the claimant and W as Mrs. and Mrs. W.
On July 10, 1975, the claimant responded to a series of five questions
propounded by the Social Security Administration in order to determine the
claimant's living arrangements and marital status. In this document the
claimant stated that ". . . sometimes we call ourselves Mr. and Mrs. but
mostly we introduce ourselves by first names." When asked how the mail is
addressed to the claimant and W, the claimant responded ". . .sometimes
it's addressed to Mr. and Mrs. W."
20 C.F.R. 416.1003(c) states that a man and a woman are 'holding
themselves out as husband and wife' if they represent themselves as
husband and wife (or as married to each other) to relatives, friends,
neighbors or tradespeople with whom they do business.
hen asked how the mail is
addressed to the claimant and W, the claimant responded ". . .sometimes
it's addressed to Mr. and Mrs. W."
20 C.F.R. 416.1003(c) states that a man and a woman are 'holding
themselves out as husband and wife' if they represent themselves as
husband and wife (or as married to each other) to relatives, friends,
neighbors or tradespeople with whom they do business.
20 C.F.R. 416.1005(a)(1) defines a marital relationship for supplemental
security income purposes to include individuals that are living together
in the same household, and holding themselves out to the community in
which they reside as husband and wife.
20 C.F.R. 416.1007 states that if a man and woman are living together in
the same household, and holding themselves out to the community in which
they reside as husband and wife, they shall be considered husband and wife
for the purpose of Title XVI of the Act. Where a man and woman living
together in the same household allege as in this case that they are not
husband and wife and that they are not holding themselves out as such to
the community in which they reside, then they must establish such in
accordance with 20 C.F.R. 416.1035(b).
The evidence is clear that under title XVI of the Social Security Act as
amended a marital relationship between claimant and W has been
established. The information supplied pursuant to the requirements of 20
C.F.R. 416.1035(b) discloses the claimant lives in the same household with
the ineligible individual and they hold themselves out to the community in
which they reside as husband and wife. The mail is often addressed to Mr.
and Mrs. W and he includes the claimant as a dependent wife on his tax
returns. In addition, the parties hold themselves out to the community as
husband and wife when being introduced to other people.
laimant lives in the same household with
the ineligible individual and they hold themselves out to the community in
which they reside as husband and wife. The mail is often addressed to Mr.
and Mrs. W and he includes the claimant as a dependent wife on his tax
returns. In addition, the parties hold themselves out to the community as
husband and wife when being introduced to other people.
As a result of the claimant's relationship with W, W's income is deemed to
be income to the claimant as required by Regulations No. 16, section
416.1185(a). It is therefore held that the claimant is not entitled to
Supplemental Security Income benefits because of excess income.
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.