SSR 62-30. EMPLOYER-EMPLOYEE RELATIONSHIP -- PRACTICAL NURSE
FederalRulings
Ask Donna
How this section applies to your facts.
Social Security Rulings › OASI › Definition of Employment/Employee › SSR 62-30
Text
R, a practical nurse, inquired at a social security district office
whether she or the patient who had engaged her services was responsible
for reporting her remuneration to the District Director of Internal
Revenue, so that she could be credited with these earnings for purposes of
old-age, survivors, and disability insurance. (The patient, B, had refused
to report the earnings). The answer to R's question depends on whether she
was B's employee or was self-employed. If she was B's employee, B must
report R's wages (and pay taxes thereon, as required by the Federal
Insurance Contributions Act), which wages would then be entered on R's
social security earnings record. On the other hand, if R was
self-employed, she cannot be credited with self-employment income for the
year unless she reports such income to the District Director of Internal
Revenue as required by the Self-Employment Contributions Act.
R had graduated as a practical nurse from the X Hospital and had recently
passed a State examination for licensing. She was listed as a practical
nurse in the telephone director and in a registry of practical nurses.
R was engaged by B from a registry of practical nurses to perform nursing
services for B in B's home. She worked an 8-hour shift, 7 days a week. R's
duties consisted of administering medicines, giving hypodermic injections,
enemas, alcohol rubs, baths, and keeping a chart of the medications given.
She also served food to B and washed the dishes used by B and herself. R
was furnished instructions about her duties by the two attending
physicians. Although she ministered to B, she was for the most part not
subject to supervision or direction by B.
isted of administering medicines, giving hypodermic injections,
enemas, alcohol rubs, baths, and keeping a chart of the medications given.
She also served food to B and washed the dishes used by B and herself. R
was furnished instructions about her duties by the two attending
physicians. Although she ministered to B, she was for the most part not
subject to supervision or direction by B.
Under section 210(j)(2) of the Social Security Act, the term "employee"
includes an individual who, under the usual common-law rules applicable in
determining the employer-employee relationship, has the status of an
employee. Whether an individual is an employee under such rules depends
upon the facts in each case. The guides for determining whether an
employer-employee relationship exists are found in Regulations No. 4, §
404.1004( c ). Generally, such relationship exists when the person
for whom the services are performed has the right to control and direct
the individual who performs the service, not only as to the result to be
accomplished by the work but also as to the manner and means by which that
result is accomplished.
In the past several years the status of practical nurses as a group has
undergone a change from one of a practically domestic role to that of a
qualified semi-professional. Almost uniform statutes now in force in all
50 States require that before qualifying as a licensed practical nurse an
individual must successfully complete a prescribed course of formal
training and pass the State's licensing examination. By reason of these
training and licensing requirements the nursing and medical professions
generally recognize licensed practical nurses as qualified to render
nursing services in all but the most acute or complex cases.
fore qualifying as a licensed practical nurse an
individual must successfully complete a prescribed course of formal
training and pass the State's licensing examination. By reason of these
training and licensing requirements the nursing and medical professions
generally recognize licensed practical nurses as qualified to render
nursing services in all but the most acute or complex cases.
Licensed practical nurses who perform private duty nursing ordinarily
have discretion in the exercise of their nursing services. Although they
may follow instructions of an attending physician, they are for the most
part not subject to sufficient supervision or control by the person for
whom they are rendering services to warrant a finding that their services
are performed in an employment relationship.
As in all situations where a determination as to the existence of an
employment relationship is required, the complete facts and all
circumstances must be considered. The pertinent factors which are of
primary significance in determining whether an employment relationship
exists between a licensed practical nurse and a person for whom the
services are performed are: (a) the type and nature of services performed;
(b) the control exercised and by whom; (c) the type of license, if any,
held by the individual; and (d) whether or not the services were performed
in the conduct of an independent trade, business, or profession.
whether an employment relationship
exists between a licensed practical nurse and a person for whom the
services are performed are: (a) the type and nature of services performed;
(b) the control exercised and by whom; (c) the type of license, if any,
held by the individual; and (d) whether or not the services were performed
in the conduct of an independent trade, business, or profession.
R held herself out as being available to perform services as a practical
nurse by being listed in the telephone directory and in the nurse's
registry. She had completed formal training and was licensed according to
State requirements. The services she performed were semi-professional in
nature rather than those of a domestic, consisting of the administering of
medications and treatments prescribed by the attending physicians; and in
the performance of these services she was subject to little direction and
control by B. The only domestic service rendered by R was the washing of
B's dishes, which was incidental to the nursing duties.
Accordingly, it is held that R was not an employee of B since
there did not exist, under the usual common-law rules, a sufficient right
of control to establish the relationship of employer and employee between
R and B.
When a person is regularly engaged in an occupation or profession for
profit and, as to such occupation or profession, is not an employee, he is
generally self-employed and, with certain exceptions not pertinent here,
his net earnings from such self-employment can be credited as
self-employment income. Accordingly, it is further held that R, in
performing services as a practical nurse for B, was self-employed.
Therefore, in order to be credited with self-employment income, R must
report such income to the District Director of Internal Revenue as
required by the Self-Employment Contributions Act.
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.