SSR 61-40. EFFECT OF SOLDIERS' AND SAILORS' CIVIL RELIEF ACT
FederalRulings
Ask Donna
How this section applies to your facts.
Social Security Rulings › OASI › Reduction of Insurance Benefits › SSR 61-40
Text
C became entitled to child's insurance benefits beginning with February
1948. In November 1952, he reported to the Social Security Administration
that he had begun to work. He was duly notified that his benefits were
subject to deductions under section 203(b) of the Social Security Act,
beginning with November 1952, and that he should notify the Administration
of changes in his work or earnings which would permit resumption of
benefit payments.
Early in August 1953, C's employment status changed. From August 1953 to
July 1958, C was on active duty with the United States armed forces.
Deductions should not have been imposed against his benefits for months
after July 1953, but the Administration was not informed of these changes
in C's status and continued to impose deductions each month through July
1954. C's entitlement ended with the latter month because he attained age
18 in August 1954.
In November 1959, C filed a statement at a district office of the
Administration. In this statement he explained what had happened since
July 1953, stated that he had not previously understood the effect of
these events, and requested payment of benefits for the months August 1953
through July 1954 on the ground that deductions imposed for those months
were erroneous. At the same time, he submitted proof of active military
service as alleged. This request raised the question whether the
determinations that deductions were applicable to C's benefits for those
months could be reopened at so late a time.
s, and requested payment of benefits for the months August 1953
through July 1954 on the ground that deductions imposed for those months
were erroneous. At the same time, he submitted proof of active military
service as alleged. This request raised the question whether the
determinations that deductions were applicable to C's benefits for those
months could be reopened at so late a time.
Regulations No. 4 provide in § 404.957 that an initial determination may
be reopened for any reason within 12 months from the date of notice of
such determination; or, upon a finding of good cause, may be reopened
later than 12 months but within 4 years after the date of the notice; or,
under certain circumstances not applicable here, may be reopened after 4
years. "Good cause" for reopening within the 4-year period will be deemed
to exist where new and material evidence is furnished. Even though the
information given by C in November 1959 constituted new and material
evidence, it cannot be used as the basis for reopening the determination
after the end of the 4-year period. It thus remains to be determined when
the period for reopening began and ended.
Under § 404.965 of Regulations No. 4, "The imposition of deductions
constitutes an initial determination with respect to each month for which
a deduction is imposed." Where deductions are imposed for consecutive
months in accordance with facts reported by the beneficiary and after
notice that they will be so imposed, no new notice is sent for each month;
the non-receipt of benefits for a month, under these circumstances, is
notice of the determination with respect to that month. In such cases, the
period for questioning the correctness of a deduction for a month for
"good cause" ends 4 years after the end of that month.
facts reported by the beneficiary and after
notice that they will be so imposed, no new notice is sent for each month;
the non-receipt of benefits for a month, under these circumstances, is
notice of the determination with respect to that month. In such cases, the
period for questioning the correctness of a deduction for a month for
"good cause" ends 4 years after the end of that month.
In November 1959, when C first questioned the correctness of deductions,
more than 4 years had elapsed after July 1954, the last month for which a
deduction was imposed against C's benefits. It would thus appear from the
regulations cited above that C raised the question too late to permit
reopening the determinations of deductions for any of the months at issue.
However, the Soldiers' and Sailors' Civil Relief Act of 1940, as amended,
provides, in pertinent part, that any period of military service (after
October 16, 1940) shall not be included in computing the period for the
bringing of any action or proceeding in any court, board, bureau,
commission, department, or other agency of government, whether such cause
of action or the right or privilege to institute such action or proceeding
shall have occurred prior to or during the period of service.
Regulations No. 4, § 404.612, implements the above portion of the
Soldiers' and Sailors' Civil Relief Act of 1940 for social security
purposes. While that regulation does not expressly provide that a period
of military service may be excluded in computing the period within which
an erroneous administrative determination may be reopened, it is necessary
to construe the regulation in the light of the broad wording and liberal
purpose of the remedial legislation which it implements. Boone v.
Lightner, 319 U.S. 561 (1943)
purposes. While that regulation does not expressly provide that a period
of military service may be excluded in computing the period within which
an erroneous administrative determination may be reopened, it is necessary
to construe the regulation in the light of the broad wording and liberal
purpose of the remedial legislation which it implements. Boone v.
Lightner, 319 U.S. 561 (1943). The reopening of an administrative
determination pursuant to specified rules and limitations contained in the
social security regulations would constitute a "proceeding" as that term
is used in the Soldiers' and Sailors' Civil Relief Act. Thus, time spent
in military service after the date of the notice of determination is
excluded in determining what is the last day on which an administrative
determination may be reopened.
With regard to the deductions for the months August 1953 through July
1954, the period within which such deduction determinations may be
reopened for good cause will not end until 4 years after the termination
of C's military service in July 1958. Accordingly, it is held that
C's evidence and request for reopening, filed in November 1959, are timely
for purposes of reopening the deduction determinations in question, and
that benefits may be paid to C for the months of August 1953 through July
1954 without deductions.
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.