SSR 82-63: Rescinded
FederalRulings
Ask Donna
How this section applies to your facts.
Social Security Rulings › DI › Vocational › SSR 82-63
Text
Rescinded and replaced effective June 22, 2024 by SSR 24-1p
(PPS-79)
SSR 82-63
PURPOSE: To clarify that there are two "medical-vocational
profiles" which show an inability to make a vocational adjustment to other
work (or any work) and which must be considered before a disability
decision-maker refers to Appendix 2 of Subpart P of Regulations No. 4 to
determine whether a claimant can do work which exists in significant
numbers in the national economy, considering the interaction of the
claimant's residual functional capacity (RFC), age, education, and work
experience. The characteristics of these two profiles are: (1) marginal
education and long work experience limited to arduous unskilled physical
labor and (2) advanced age, limited education and no work experience.
CITATIONS (AUTHORITY): Sections 223(d)(2)(A) and 1614(a)(3)(B) of
the Social Security Act, as amended; Regulations No. 4, Subpart P,
sections 404.1505(a), 404.1520(f), 404.1521, 404.1545, 404.1560, 404.1561,
404.1562, 404.1563(d), 404.1564, 404.1565, and 404.1568; Appendix 2 of
Subpart P, Regulations No. 4, sections 203.00(b) and (c); and Regulations
No. 16, Subpart I, sections 416.905(a), 416.920(f), 416.921, 416.945,
416.960, 416.961, 416.962, 416.963(d), 416.964, 416.965 and 416.968.
INTRODUCTION: The law provides that, in order to be found
disabled, an individual (except for a title II widow, widower, or
surviving divorced spouse or a title XVI child younger than age 18 or a
"statutorily blind" individual) must have a medically determinable
physical or mental impairment(s) of such severity that he or she is not
only unable to do previous work but cannot, considering his or her age,
education, and work experience, engage in any other kind of substantial
gainful work which exists in the national economy
rced spouse or a title XVI child younger than age 18 or a
"statutorily blind" individual) must have a medically determinable
physical or mental impairment(s) of such severity that he or she is not
only unable to do previous work but cannot, considering his or her age,
education, and work experience, engage in any other kind of substantial
gainful work which exists in the national economy. Sections
404.1520/416.920 of the regulations provide a sequential evaluation
process whereby current work activity, severity and duration of the
impairment(s), ability to do past work, and vocational factors are
considered in that order. In the fifth and last step of the sequential
evaluation process, consideration is given to the impaired individual's
capability to perform other work differing from that of his or her past
relevant work experience (or, in the case of a person without work
experience, his or her capability to begin to work). At this step, we
consider what the person can do functionally and the vocational factors of
his or her age, education, and work experience.
Work Experience Limited to Arduous Unskilled Physical Labor
Regulations issued in 1957 to implement the title II disability program
provided for the consideration of vocational factors in addition to the
primary consideration given to the severity of the worker's impairment.
In 1960, section 404.1502(c) was added to the regulations as the first
specific directive for a finding of disability based on both medical and
vocational factors. That section described an individual whose vocational
limitations are so restrictive that the existence of an impairment which
prevents the individual from doing his or her usual level of work would
ordinarily justify a finding of disability. The provisions of former
section 404.1502(c) are now reflected in sections 404.1562/416.962 of the
regulations
th medical and
vocational factors. That section described an individual whose vocational
limitations are so restrictive that the existence of an impairment which
prevents the individual from doing his or her usual level of work would
ordinarily justify a finding of disability. The provisions of former
section 404.1502(c) are now reflected in sections 404.1562/416.962 of the
regulations. These sections address the claimant who has only a marginal
education and work experience limited to 35 years or more of arduous
unskilled physical labor. Rule 203.01 in Table No. 3 of Appendix 2
somewhat approximates the criteria in those sections. However, should rule
203.01 be referred to before sections 404.1562/416.962, an individual
younger than age 60 with a background of 35 years or more in unskilled
arduous physical labor might be overlooked.
No Work Experience
Under title II, a person must have a significant and recent attachment to
the work force to acquire disability insured status.
Disability benefits under title XVI were first payable in 1974. Under the
title XVI program, financial need -- low income and resources -- is an
eligibility criterion rather than disability insured status. However, the
disability evaluation standards are essentially the same for both titles
II and XVI. Since a large number of title XVI claimants have little or no
work history, the question arose as to how much adjudicative weight should
be given to the absence of work experience. The lack of work experience is
a vocationally adverse factor in that a person who has not been in the
labor market has not developed any basic knowledge of work products or
services, the ability to relate and communicate to supervisors and
coworkers, the work habits of scheduling time, etc
uestion arose as to how much adjudicative weight should
be given to the absence of work experience. The lack of work experience is
a vocationally adverse factor in that a person who has not been in the
labor market has not developed any basic knowledge of work products or
services, the ability to relate and communicate to supervisors and
coworkers, the work habits of scheduling time, etc. Recognizing that as a
person grows older the ability to compensate for the lack of work
experience diminishes, the Social Security Administration (SSA)
established a policy in 1975 which provided that, up to a point, all other
factors being equal, claimants without work experience and those who have
performed only unskilled work would be treated the same. That point is
advanced age. The policy decision, in effect, directs a finding of
disability where a person has a severe impairment of any nature, is of
advanced age, has only the limited educational competence required for
unskilled work, and has no work experience at all or no recent and
relevant work experience.
Rules 203.02 and 203.10 in Table No. 3 of Appendix 2 reflect the policy
decision in July 1975 with respect to persons who have a severe exertional
impairment which limits them to the medium level of work exertion.
However, should only rules 203.02 and 203.10 be considered, a person with
a severe nonexertional impairment who is of advanced age, has a limited
education, and has no recent and relevant work experience might not be
found to be disabled.
POLICY STATEMENT: When an adjudicator has reached the last step of
the sequential evaluation process -- sections 404.1520(f)/416.920(f) of
the regulations -- he or she must consider two medical-vocational profiles
which direct decisions of disability before considering the numbered rules
in Appendix 2 of the regulations.
Severity of Impairment
erience might not be
found to be disabled.
POLICY STATEMENT: When an adjudicator has reached the last step of
the sequential evaluation process -- sections 404.1520(f)/416.920(f) of
the regulations -- he or she must consider two medical-vocational profiles
which direct decisions of disability before considering the numbered rules
in Appendix 2 of the regulations.
Severity of Impairment
For the purpose of evaluation under sections 404.1562/416.962 of the
regulations, an impairment must be severe and prevent the performance of
arduous physical labor. It is necessary to assess the person's RFC and to
relate it to the physical and mental demands of his or her arduous work
background.
History of Arduous Unskilled Work
The individual's work history must have the following characteristics:
Marginal education
EFFECTIVE DATE: The policy explained herein was effective on
August 20, 1980, the date the regulations covering the basic policy in the
subject area were effective (45 FR 55566).
CROSS-REFERENCES: Program Operations Manual System, Part 4
(Disability Insurance State Manual Procedures) sections DI 2041C, 2381,
and 2387B.6.
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.