SSR 72-41: FEDERAL COAL MINE HEALTH AND SAFETY ACT OF 1969 -- SECTION 412(b), (30 U.S.C. 922(b)) -- DISABILITY BENEFITS PAID UNDER STATE WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION LAW AFTER MINER'S DEATH -- PENNSYLVANIA

FederalRulings

Ask Donna

How this section applies to your facts.

Social Security Rulings › DI › Black Lung Benefits › SSR 72-41

This text was captured on Aug 14, 2026. It is a snapshot, not a live feed, so check the official code before relying on it.

Text

20 CFR 410.101 et seq.

SSR 72-41

A question has been raised as to whether the residual Pennsylvania

occupational disease benefit for the month of death, which is

automatically paid to the miner's widow, constitutes a payment "on account

of the disability of the miner" and thus cause for reduction of her "black

lung" benefits for that month, under section 412(b) of the Federal Coal

Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969. If the State compensation due a

disabled miner but paid to his spouse is a payment to her "on account of

the disability of such miner" with respect to a periodic benefit she

receives entirely in her own right after his death, such payment would

require a reduction of her monthly "black lung" widow's benefit. If,

however, such payment constitutes a payment to her on account of the

miner's death, there would be no cause for such reduction.

Section 410 of the Pennsylvania Occupational Disease Act, 77 P.S. 1510,

provides, in pertinent part, that:

An identical provision is contained in section 410 of the Pennsylvania

Workmen's Compensation Act, 77 P.S. 751.

While Pennsylvania law thus makes provision in some cases for

compensation due a disabled employee to be paid to his widow when the

employee's claim is not adjudicated until after his death, comparable

statutory provisions do not appear to have been enacted with respect to

compensation payments due for the period immediately prior to the death of

an employee who had before his death established his entitlement to

compensation payments. However, it appears that the Bureau of Workmen's

Compensation of the Pennsylvania Department of Labor and Industry

automatically pays any such benefit to the employee's widow even when

there is a legally administered estate. In either case, a State benefit

due a disabled employee in his own right for a period of entitlement

preceding his death is not paid until after his death.

Section 412(b) of the Federal Act provides, in pertinent part, that:

ion of the Pennsylvania Department of Labor and Industry

automatically pays any such benefit to the employee's widow even when

there is a legally administered estate. In either case, a State benefit

due a disabled employee in his own right for a period of entitlement

preceding his death is not paid until after his death.

Section 412(b) of the Federal Act provides, in pertinent part, that:

It is conceded that the Pennsylvania payment in question would not be

made unless the miner had been disabled. It is equally true that the

establishment or continuation of benefit entitlement under State law, as

well as the amount due, does not require the miner's death. The issue then

is does death change the nature of the payment or, to state it another

way, is a compensation payment made to the miner's widow on account of his

death, a derivative payment or a wholly independent payment. Under

Pennsylvania law, it is clear that workmen's compensation death claims are

independent of, and not derivative from, workmen's compensation disability

claims. Segal v. Segal , 191 A.2d 858, 861 (Pa. Super., 1963); Moore v. Dodge Steel Co. , 213 A.2d 130, 132f. (Pa. Super., 1965); Wilson v. United News Transportation Co. , 261 A.2d 338, 341f. (Pa.

Super., 1969).

Since the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act does not have a

provision such as section 410 of the Pennsylvania Occupational Disease

Act, supra (which is analogous to the underpayment provisions in section

204(d) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 404(d)), the unpaid amount of

"black lung" payments due a deceased miner would become an asset of his

estate. Whether the assets of the estate of a miner leaving a spouse are

distributed by will, by intestacy, or under a "small estate" statute, some

part of them is likely to devolve upon his surviving widow

e underpayment provisions in section

204(d) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 404(d)), the unpaid amount of

"black lung" payments due a deceased miner would become an asset of his

estate. Whether the assets of the estate of a miner leaving a spouse are

distributed by will, by intestacy, or under a "small estate" statute, some

part of them is likely to devolve upon his surviving widow. That part of

such assets might be the amount of an "underpayment" of State workmen's

compensation benefits to which the miner had established entitlement on

account of his disability, patently should not require a reduction in the

survivor benefits to which his widow was entitled in her own right under

the provisions of section 412(b) of the Federal "black lung" Act. The

"residual" payment provisions operate, in effect, to dispose only of what would otherwise be a part of the deceased worker's estate.

This would appear also to be the view of the Supreme Court of

Pennsylvania, which had occasion to describe section 410 of the

Pennsylvania statute as follows:

* * * * * * *

The Court further indicated that:

It would follow, then, that the transfer to the widow of such an accrued

amount which would have been paid to the miner had he liver is, at the

least, part of the settlement of the miner's estate; at most, it is in the

nature of a workmen's compensation payment to the widow on account of the

miner's death.

Pennsylvania statute as follows:

* * * * * * *

The Court further indicated that:

It would follow, then, that the transfer to the widow of such an accrued

amount which would have been paid to the miner had he liver is, at the

least, part of the settlement of the miner's estate; at most, it is in the

nature of a workmen's compensation payment to the widow on account of the

miner's death.

Furthermore, a reduction in a widow's periodic "black lung" benefit

because of this type of payment would not appear to serve the underlying

purposes of the reduction provisions in section 412(b) of the Act. Those

provisions are analogous to the workmen's compensation offset provisions

in section 224 of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 424a, just as the

excess earnings reduction provisions in the Federal "black lung" Act are

analogous to (in fact, expressly incorporate) the excess earnings

provisions in section 203 of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 403. While

neither Title IV nor its legislative history spell out why Congress

included these reduction provisions in the "black lung" benefits program,

it is reasonable to assume that their purposes are the same as those

underlying the comparable social security provisions, i.e., that

prescribed levels of income be maintained without producing "windfalls" by

the payment of duplicate Federal benefits or the payment of Federal

benefits not needed to maintain such levels of income.

reduction provisions in the "black lung" benefits program,

it is reasonable to assume that their purposes are the same as those

underlying the comparable social security provisions, i.e., that

prescribed levels of income be maintained without producing "windfalls" by

the payment of duplicate Federal benefits or the payment of Federal

benefits not needed to maintain such levels of income.

Nor would a reduction of the "black lung" death benefit due a widow in

her own right comport with the monthly character of benefit entitlement

and payments under the Federal Act. As noted above, section 412(b)

provides for reductions "on a monthly or other appropriate basis." This is

one of several statutory indications that the "black lung" benefits

program be administered on a monthly basis. (For a discussion of these

provisions, see SSR 71-30 , C.B. 1971, p.

114). Under such a scheme, as under Title II of the Social Security Act, a

reduction against a monthly benefit is imposed with respect to the benefit for the month in which the reduction event occurs. If the event in

question is some payment, such as a State workmen's compensation payment,

the reduction is imposed against the benefit for the month in which

the right to the State payment accrues, regardless of when it is paid.

(Also see 20 CFR 404.408(c)). On this basis, a current reduction of a

widow's "black lung" benefit because of payments due a disabled miner in

the past (even though being paid to the miner's widow currently because of

his death) would be contrary to the statutory scheme. Only where a miner

is entitled to State workmen's compensation and Federal "black lung"

benefits for the same month is there a duplication of benefits for that month regardless of when these respective benefits are

actually paid -- whether before or after the miner's death

even though being paid to the miner's widow currently because of

his death) would be contrary to the statutory scheme. Only where a miner

is entitled to State workmen's compensation and Federal "black lung"

benefits for the same month is there a duplication of benefits for that month regardless of when these respective benefits are

actually paid -- whether before or after the miner's death. The avoidance

of such duplication would support the reduction of the Federal "black

lung" benefits of the miner even where paid as an underpayment to

the legal representative of the miner's estate, e.g., his widow, after his

death, but where there is no such duplication of benefits for a given

month, there should be no reduction of "black lung" benefits.

In this sense, a State disability payment due the miner on account of his

disability (and to which he was determined to be entitled before he died)

is not related to the payment of benefits due his widow in her own right

because of his death. The nature of this situation is not essentially

changed merely because a reduction is avoided where the miner was not

entitled to Federal "black lung" benefits before his death, e.g., he never

filed for such benefits. Where the miner himself never became entitled to

Federal "black lung" benefits so that ny State benefits due him could not

have resulted in a reduction of his "black lung" benefits, no statutory

provision is offended by paying the widow the "black lung" benefit to

which she is entitled in her own right, without any reduction under

section 412(b) of the Act.

ver

filed for such benefits. Where the miner himself never became entitled to

Federal "black lung" benefits so that ny State benefits due him could not

have resulted in a reduction of his "black lung" benefits, no statutory

provision is offended by paying the widow the "black lung" benefit to

which she is entitled in her own right, without any reduction under

section 412(b) of the Act.

Accordingly, it is held that payment of a benefit under a State

workmen's compensation law on account of the disability of a miner must

reduce an "underpayment" of Federal "black lung" benefits due the miner

but paid to his widow as his legal representative after his death, but further held , such State payment, payable to the miner's spouse on

account of his death, will not, under section 412(b), supra, reduce any

"black lung" benefits to which she is entitled in her own right as a widow

under section 412(a)(2) of such Act, supra.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.